ASSESSMENT OF THE PRIORITY OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT GOALS IN THE CONTEXT OF CURRENT CHALLENGES FOR UKRAINE

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17721/1728-2667.2026/228-1/19

Keywords:

the goals of sustainable development, multi-criteria analysis methods, economic component of sustainable development, social component of sustainable development, environmental component of sustainable development, the priority of sustainable development goals

Abstract

B a c k g r o u n d . The global coronavirus pandemic, combined with economic, social, and environmental challenges during a full-scale invasion, has had a profoundly negative impact on the system of interaction among businesses, consumers, partners, and stakeholders. The modern business landscape requires coordinated actions by the global community to establish balance in the domestic business ecosystem, interacting with international donors and potential investors. A full-scale invasion is a catalyst for the sustainability of domestic businesses. It is the ability to ensure economic survival while simultaneously preserving social responsibility and the environmental interests of natural ecosystems. The goal of the study is to develop an algorithm for conducting a comprehensive assessment of the priority of sustainable development goals. We substantiate a methodological support. According to this approach, we group the goals by economic, environmental, and social indicators, generalizing the criteria for their selection in different periods (before and during the war), and identifying the changes that have occurred.

M e t h o d s . One of the objectives of the study is to determine the priority of implementing sustainable development goals in different periods (before the war and during the war) and identify the changes that occurred. Solving the problem of determining the priority of implementing these goals at a practical level can be reduced to their ranking within each component using multicriteria analysis methods. They are widely represented in management theory and practice. To solve the research tasks, we use methods for evaluating alternatives. They are TOPSIS, SAW, COPRAS.

R e s u l t s . The modern challenges that Ukraine faces today have somewhat changed the priority of implementing sustainable development goals across all components of sustainable development: by the economic component, "peace and justice" and "partnership for sustainable development" are becoming relevant for Ukraine; by the social component, the goals of "decent work and economic growth" and "quality education" are the first; by the environmental component, the goals of "affordable and clean energy" and "clean water and adequate sanitation" became prioritized.

C o n c l u s i o n s . The war in Ukraine has brought to the fore the issue of theoretical discourse around the priority of sustainable development components for our state. But the war did not change the desire of entrepreneurs to solve their economic problems, taking into account the development of the concept of sustainable development, solving social issues, and respecting the environmental interests of society.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Filho, W. L., Vidal, D. G., Chen, C., Petrova, M., Dinis, M. A. P., Yang, P., Rogers, S., Álvarez-Castañón, L., Djekic, I., Sharifi, A., & Neiva, S. (2022). An assessment of requirements in investments, new technologies, and infrastructures to achieve the SDGs. Environmental Sciences Europe, 34(58). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12302-022-00629-9

Hák, T., Janousková, S., & Moldan, B. (2016). Sustainable Development Goals: A Need for Relevant Indicators. Ecological Indicators, 60, 565–573. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.08.003

Hwang, C. L., & Yoon, K. (1981). Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications. Springer-Verlag, New York. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-48318-9

Kravchenko, M. & Prudkyiy, V. (2020). Model for the Analysis of Sustainable Development of an Enterprise, taking into account risk. Economic Bulletin of NTUU "Kyiv Polytechnic Institute", 17, 291–305 [in Ukrainian]. [Кравченко, М., Прудкий, В. (2020). Модель аналізу сталого розвитку підприємства з урахуванням ризику. Економічний вісник НТУУ "Київський політехнічний інститут", 17, 291–305]. https://doi.org/10.20535/2307-5651.17.2020.216368

Ma, F., Wang, H., Tzachor, A., Hidalgo, C. A., Schandl, H., Zhang, Y., Zhang, J., Chen, W.-Q., Zhao, Y., Zhu, Y.-G. & Fu, B. (2025). The disparities and development trajectories of nations in achieving the sustainable development goals. Nature Communications, 16(1107). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-56076-6

MacCrimmon, K. R. (1968). Decision Making among Multiple-Attribute Alternatives: A Survey and Consolidated Approach. Advanced Research Projects Agency.

Сabinet Ministriv of Ukraine. (2017). Sustainable Development Goals: Ukraine (National Report) [in Ukrainian]. [Кабінет Міністрів України. (2017). Цілі сталого розвитку: Україна [Національна доповідь] ]. https://www.kmu.gov.ua/storage/app/sites/1/natsionalna-dopovid-csr-Ukrainy.pdf

Okolie, C. C., Danso-Abbeam, G., Ogundeji, A. A., Owolabi, S. T. & Kunguma, O. (2025). Achieving the Sustainable Development Goals through nature-based solutions amidst climate change. Evidence from Scopus and Web of Science (WoS) databases. Sustainable Futures, 10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sftr.2025.100855

Osgood, C. E. (1953). Method and theory in experimental psychology. New York : Oxford University Press.

Shmorgun, Ye. (2022). The model of sustainable development as an economic category. Bulletin of Khmelnytskyi National University, 4, 197–201 [in Ukrainian]. [Шморгун, Є. (2022). Модель сталого розвитку як економічна категорія. Вісник Хмельницького національного університету, 4, 197–201]. https://doi.org/10.31891/2307-5740-2022-308-4-31

Stukalo, N., Lytvyn, M., Petrushenko, Yu., Pylypenko, Yu. & Kolinets, L. (2021). The concept of sustainable development of Ukraine in the context of global threats. Naukovyi Visnyk Natsionalnoho Hirnychoho Universytetu, 3, 178–183 [in Ukrainian]. [Стукало, Н., Литвин, М., Петрушенко, Ю., Пилипенко Ю., Колінець Л. (2021). Концепція сталого розвитку України в контексті глобальних загроз. Науковий вісник Національного гірничого університету, 3, 178–183]. https://doi.org/10.33271/nvngu/2021¬3/178

Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. (2019). On the Sustainable Development Goals of Ukraine for the period until 2030 (Decree of the President of Ukraine dated September 30, 2019, № 722/2019) [in Ukrainian]. [Верховна Рада України. (2019). Про Цілі сталого розвитку України на період до 2030 року (Указ Президента України від 30.09.2019 р. № 722/2019)]. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/722/2019#Text

UN Documents. (1973, June). Action Plan for the Human Environment: programme development and priorities: report of the Executive Director. http://www.un-documents.net/aphe.pdf

UN Documents. (1987, August). Our Common Future. Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development. Development and International Co-operation: Environment. http://www.un-documents.net/wced-ocf.htm

UN Documents. (1972, June). Report of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment. http://www.un-documents.net/aconf48-14r1.pdf

UN. General Assembly. (1992, December). Institutional arrangements to follow up the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development. Resolution. http://www.un-documents.net/a47r191.htm

UN. General Assembly. (1992, June). Report of the United Nations Conference on environment and development. Rio Declaration on Environment and Development. http://www.un-documents.net/rio-dec.htm

UN. General Assembly. (2016, December). Sustainable development: implementation of Agenda 21, the Programme for the Further Implementation of Agenda 21 and the outcomes of the World Summit on Sustainable Development and on the United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development: report of the 2nd Committee: General Assembly, 71st session. http://www.un-documents.net/ares64-236.pdf

Zamula, I. V., Shavurska, O. V., & Kireitseva, H. V. (2024). Sustainable Development of Ukraine as an Innovative Approach to Its Post-War Recovery. Science and Innovation, 20(3), 3–16. https://doi.org/10.15407/scine20.03.003

Zatonatska, T., Sitnicki, M., Bilorus, T., Firsova, S. & Anisimova, O. (2025). Managing the Sustainable Development of the Enterprise Based on the Vulnerability Level. Marketing and Management of Innovations, 16(1), 47–62. https://doi.org/10.21272/mmi.2025.1-04

Zavadskas, E. K., & Kaklauskas, A. (1996). Multicriteria Evaluation of Building (Pastatų sistemotechninis įvertinimas). Vilnius : Technika.

Downloads

Published

2026-02-02

How to Cite

FIRSOVA, S., BILORUS, T., & OLIKH, L. (2026). ASSESSMENT OF THE PRIORITY OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT GOALS IN THE CONTEXT OF CURRENT CHALLENGES FOR UKRAINE. Bulletin of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv. Economics, 1(228), 180-190. https://doi.org/10.17721/1728-2667.2026/228-1/19

Most read articles by the same author(s)