THE SYSTEMIC NATURE OF INSTITUTIONAL TRANSFORMATIONSIN THE STRUCTURAL POLICY OF INNOVATIVE DEVELOPMENT OF THE UKRAINIAN ECONOMY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17721/1728-2667.2024/225-2/5Keywords:
system analysis, structural policy, structural changes, innovations, innovative development, institutional concept, institutional strategyAbstract
B a c k g r o u n d. The issues of structural policy and systemic restructuring of the national economy, its innovative modernization are the issues of the future of Ukraine, a strong European state. The current practice of structural reforms in Ukraine shows that the qualitative characteristics of structural policy lag far behind European standards in this area. The purpose of the article was to systematically analyze the characteristics of structural policy and to identify and provide institutional recommendations for state participation in innovative economic development during the war and the period of post-war economic reconstruction in Ukraine.
M e t h o d s. A set of empirical and theoretical research methods was used: methods of analysis, synthesis and generalization, which at the dialectical level allow to scientifically substantiate popular models of innovative development. A methodological analysis of theoretical doctrines was carried out to reveal the political and economic foundations of the study of structural transformations and structural policy.
R e s u l t s. The features of the systematic approach to the study of patterns of innovative development and systemic restructuring of the national economy as a whole are revealed. This approach makes it possible to make fundamental clarifications of the institutional transformations of structural policy in the period of fundamental changes in the national economy. It is found that innovative development based on knowledge is the defining imperative of structural policy and determines the creation of "new" development institutions. The experience of economically developed countries shows that innovative development is a priority direction of structural policy. The author analyzes the conceptual interrelationships of the structural policy objectives, the systemic nature of the structural policy of innovative modernization, the institutional limitations of structural changes in the Ukrainian economy and the need to overcome the institutional "ineffective" structural policy. The features of the institution of structural policy as a factor in optimizing the state's participation in the innovative development of the economy are investigated. It is established that institutional theory is one of the most important components of the structural policy of innovative development of the modern economy. It is determined that digital platforms can become a key factor in structural changes that will ensure the innovative development of Ukraine's economy.
C o n c l u s i o n s. The research results indicate the growing influence of systemic trends in the structural policy of innovative development and can be used to develop specific concepts, a special categorical apparatus, a high-quality institutional environment, forms and tools for strengthening the institutional concept of innovative modernization.
Downloads
References
Adzhemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. (2016). Why nations fail: The origins of power, prosperity, and poverty (O. Dem'ianchuk, Trans.). Nash Format [in Ukrainian].
Bazylevych, V.D., & Hrazhevska, N.I. (2022). Economic development of Ukraine: Conceptual principles and institutional dimension. Lira K [in Ukrainian].
Hasanov, S.S. (2012). Structural transformations of the economy and public finances. Problems of methodology, theory, economic policy. State educational and scientific institution "Academy of Financial Management" [in Ukrainian].
Research on the state and needs of business in wartime: survey results in December 2023 – January 2024. (2024). DiyaBusiness.[in Ukrainian]. https://business.diia.gov.ua/en/cases/novini/doslidzenna-stanu-ta-potreb biznesu-v-umovah-vijni-rezultati-opituvanna-v-grudni-2023-sicni-2024-roku
Digital Transformation Index of Regions of Ukraine: Results of 2023. (2023). Ministry of Digital Transformation of Ukraine [in Ukrainian].https://cms.thedigital.gov.ua/storage/uploads/files/page/community/reports/%D0%86%D0%BD%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BA%D1%81_%D1%86%D0%B8%D1%84%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%BE%D1%97_%D1%82%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%BD%D1%81%D1%84%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%BC%D0%B0%D1%86%D1%96%D1%97_%D1%80%D0%B5%D0%B3%D1%96%D0%BE%D0%BD%D1%96%D0%B2_%D0%A3%D0%BA%D1%80%D0%B 0%D1%97%D0%BD%D0%B8_2023_compressed.pdf
Kindzerskyi, Yu.V. (2013). Industry of Ukraine: Strategy and Policy of Structural and Technological Modernization. National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Institute of Economics and Forecasting.[in Ukrainian].
Kraus, N. M. (2015). The formation of an innovative economy in the context of institutional changes. Center for Educational Literature [in Ukrainian].
Kulchytskyi, Ya.V. (2011). Modern economic systems in the conditions of environmentalization and globalization (theoretical and methodological principles of comparison). National Forestry University of Ukraine [in Ukrainian].
Maslov, A. O. (2021). Information and knowledge economy. PPC "Kyiv University" [in Ukrainian].
Moskalenko, O.M. (2014). Theory and model of advanced economic development in the system of social strategic needs. Economy of Ukraine, 8, 4–18.[in Ukrainian]
Supporting the Teams and the Army: How Business Works in Wartime. (2022). European Business Association. [in Ukrainian]. https://eba.com.ua/ pidtrymuyut-komandy-ta-armiyu-yak-pratsyuye-biznes-v-umovah-vijny/
Reshetylo, V. P .et al. (2013). Institutional factors of sustainable development of regional socio-economic systems. Kharkiv National Academy of Urban Economy [in Ukrainian].
Shlaifer, M., & Todoschuk, A. (2022). Digitalization of the Ukrainian economy in the context of European integration. Economy and Society, 45 [in Ukrainian]. https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0072/2022-45-10
Shumpeter, Yo. A. (2011). Theory of Economic Development: A Study of Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest, and the Business Cycle (W. Stark, Trans.). Kyiv-Mohyla Academy Publishing House. [in Ukrainian]
Clark, C. (1957). The conditions of economic progress. Macmillan; St. Martin's Press.
Denison, E. F. (1967). Why growth rates differ: Postwar experience in nine Western countries. Brookings Institution.
DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1991). The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. University of Chicago Press.
Dutta, S., Lanvin, B., & Wunsch-Vincent, S. (2015). The global innovation index 2015: Effective innovation policies for development. WIPO. https://www.wipo.int/edocs/pubdocs/en/wipo_gii_2015.pdf
Dutta, S., Lanvin, B., & Wunsch-Vincent, S. (2016). The global innovation index 2016: Winning with global innovation. WIPO. https://www.wipo.int/ edocs/pubdocs/en/wipo_pub_gii_2016.pdf
Dutta, S., Lanvin, B., & Wunsch-Vincent, S. (2017). The global innovation index 2017: Innovation feeding the world. WIPO. https://www.wipo.int/ edocs/pubdocs/en/wipo_pub_gii_2017.pdf
Dutta, S., Lanvin, B., & Wunsch-Vincent, S. (2018). The global innovation index 2018: Energizing the world with innovation. WIPO. https://www.wipo.int/edocs/pubdocs/en/wipo_pub_gii_2018.pdf
Dutta, S., Lanvin, B., & Wunsch-Vincent, S. (2019). The global innovation index 2019: Creating healthy lives – The future of medical innovation. WIPO. https://www.wipo.int/edocs/pubdocs/en/wipo_pub_gii_2019.pdf
Dutta, S., Lanvin, B., & Wunsch-Vincent, S. (2020). The global innovation index 2020: Who will finance innovation? WIPO. https://www.wipo.int/ edocs/pubdocs/en/wipo_pub_gii_2020.pdf
Dutta, S., Lanvin, B., Rivera León, L., & Wunsch-Vincent, S. (2021). The global innovation index 2021: Tracking innovation through the COVID-19 crisis. WIPO. https://www.wipo.int/edocs/pubdocs/en/wipo_pub_gii_2021.pdf
Dutta, S., Lanvin, B., Rivera León, L., & Wunsch-Vincent, S. (2022). The global innovation index 2022: What is the future of innovation-driven growth? WIPO. https://www.wipo.int/edocs/pubdocs/en/wipo-pub-2000-2022-en-main-report-global-innovation-index-2022-15th-edition.pdf
Dutta, S., Lanvin, B., Rivera León, L., & Wunsch-Vincent, S. (2023). The global innovation index 2023: Innovation in the face of uncertainty. WIPO. https://www.wipo.int/documents/d/global-innovation-index/docs-en-wipo-pub2000-2023-en-main-report-global-innovation-index-2023-16th-edition.pdf
Fisher, A. G. B. (1939). Production, primary, secondary, and tertiary. The Economic Record, 15(1), 24–38.
Freeman, C., Clark, J., & Soete, L. (1982). Unemployment and technical innovation: A study on long waves and economic development. Frances Pinter.
Galbraith, J. K. (2007). The new industrial state. Princeton University Press.
IMD. (2023). World digital competitiveness ranking 2023. https://www.imd.org/ centers/wcc/world-competitiveness-center/rankings/world-digital-competitiveness ranking/
Khodzhaian, A. A., Ignatyuk, A. I., Korneev, V. V., & Khodzhaian, A. R. (2021). Modeling of the effect of structural shifts on the economic dynamics in Ukraine. Scientific Bulletin of the National Mining University, 2, 170–177 [in Ukrainian]. https://doi.org/10.33271/nvngu/2021-2/170
Nelson, R., & Winter, S. (1982). An evolutionary theory of economic change. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change, and economic performance. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/ CBO9780511808678
OECD/EC. (2005). Oslo manual: Guidelines for collecting and interpreting innovation data (3rd ed.). OECD Publishing.
Smith, A. (1904). An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations (E. Cannan, Ed.). Methuen. https://oll.libertyfund.org/titles/237
The Transformation Index. (2024). BTI. https://www.bti-project.org
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 д-р екон. наук, проф. Валерій ОСЕЦЬКИЙ, д-р екон. наук, проф. Андрій КАМІНСЬКИЙ, д-р філософії Вікторія КУЛІШ
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Please read more here: https://econom.bulletin.knu.ua/copyright
