ADAM SMITH: EGOISM AT THE SERVICE OF THE ECONOMY

Authors

  • Billel DJEGHRI, PhD (Econ.), Senior Lecturer Університет Константіна 2 імені Абдельгаміда Мегрі, Константіна, Алжир https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8280-8393

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17721/1728-2667.2023/223-2/3

Keywords:

Adam Smith, egoism, individual interest, harmonization, general interest

Abstract

Background. Defenders of scientific economics will enthusiastically look to Adam Smith's writings for arguments in favor of free trade to bolster the metaphor that heralds later formulations of general equilibrium theory, while his critics will be just as tenacious in seeking out Adam Smith's highly debatable assumptions and methods that call into question the discursive chain of political economy. The aim of this article is to situate Adam Smith's thesis of liberalism and his philosophy of egoism in its historical context, in order to better understand the workings of our modern economy and its future, taking note of the fact that Adam Smith sought to transpose certain anthropological principles to the sciences in general, and to economics in particular.

Methods. The author has adopted classic scientific research methods. First, a historical method is used to provide a portrait of Adam Smith and the key events in his life that shaped his vision of economics. Then, a descriptive method focusing on an overview of Adam Smith's main theses on egoism and its interaction with economics. Finally, an analytical method, based on a detour through Adam Smith's anthropology and moral philosophy, will enable us to better understand why a society driven by self-interest can survive and even prosper.

Results. The article concludes that, for Adam Smith, the "egoistic" motive that drives each individual to constantly improve his or her economic situation generates beneficial effects at the national level and leads to the best possible economic organization by achieving the general interest through competition. In this respect, egoism will always be the main force organizing the economic activities of any society. Natural equilibrium therefore results from the interaction of all individuals in the economy and the confrontation of their interests, without the need for any regulatory intervention, because all individuals, in one way or another, are selfish.

Conclusions. For over a century, Adam Smith's thinking on egoism and its role in the economy has been consciously or unconsciously decontextualized to serve the ideology of free-market advocates. It's true that Adam Smith's famous metaphor of the "invisible hand" alluded to the harmonious functioning of the "market". In other words, the selfishness of each leads to an equilibrium through the satisfaction of his or her self-interest. We can't deny that, for Adam Smith, liberalism is still based to a certain extent on the principle of a natural equilibrium resulting from the way we all play our part in the economy and the confrontation of our interests.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ashraf, Nava, Colin F. Camerer, & Loewenstein, George. (2005). Adam Smith, Behavioral Economist. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19 (3), 131–145. https://pubs.aeaweb.org/doi/pdfplus/10.1257/089533005774357897

Berry, Christopher J. (2018). Adam Smith: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press, United Kingdom.

Blanqui, J. A., Buchanan, D., Say, J. B., McCulloch, J. R., Smith, A., & Simonde de Sismondi, J.C.L. (1834). Recherche sur la nature et les causes de la richesse des nations (2 éd.). J. A. Blanqui. France.

Bowles, Samuel. (2016). The Moral Economy: Why Good Incentives Are No Substitute for Good Citizens. Yale University Press, New Haven and London, United Kingdom.

Corsa, Andrew J. (2021). Thomas Hobbes on Civility, Magnanimity, and Scientific Discourse. Hobbes Studies, 34(2), 201–226. https://doi.org/10.1163/18750257-BJA10032

Dupont, Brandon, & Durham, Yvonne. (2021). Adam Smith and the not so invisible hand: A revision for the undergraduate classroom. International Review of Economics Education, 36 (C). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iree.2020.100205

Greenspan, Alan. (2013). Never Saw It Coming: Why the Financial Crisis Took Economists by Surprise. Foreign Affairs, 92(6), 88–96. https://www.foreignaffairs.com/united-states/2008-crisis-never-saw-coming

Harrison, Peter. (2011). Adam Smith and the History of the Invisible Hand. Journal of the History of Ideas, 72(1), 29–49. https://doi.org/10.1353/jhi.2011.a413473

Helvétius, Claude-Adrien. (1758). De l'esprit, Laurent Durand, France.

Hindman, Hugh D. (2009). The World of child labor: an historical and regional survey, Routledge, USA.

Honoré, Lionel. (1997). L'Économie est-elle une science? : Un exposé pour comprendre, un essai pour réfléchir, Flammarion, France.

Ioannou, Stefanos., & Wójcik, Dariusz. (2021). Was Adam Smith an economic geographer? GeoJournal, 87, 5425–5434. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-021-10499-y

Janoski, Thomas., & Lepadatu, Darina. (2014). Dominant Divisions of Labor: Models of Production that Have Transformed the World of Work, Kindle. USA.

Kennedy, Gavi. (2009). Adam Smith and the Invisible Hand: From Metaphor to Myth. Econ. Journal Watch, 6(2), pp. 239–263. https://econjwatch.org/File+download/252/2009-05-kennedy-watchpad.pdf?mimetype=pdf

Klein, Daniel B., & Lucas, Brandon. (2011). In a Word or Two, Placed in the Middle: The Invisible Hand in Smith's Tomes. Economic Affairs, 31(1), 43–52. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0270.2010.02047.x

Liu, Glory M. (2020). Rethinking the "Chicago Smith" Problem. Adam Smith and the Chicago School, 1929–1980. Modern Intellectual History, 17(4), 1041–1068. https://doi.org/10.1017/S147924431900009X

Magdalena, Planeta. (2006). L’influence intellectuelle en économie : le cas d’Adam Smith et d’Amartya Sen. Université du Québec à Montréal. Canada, p. 1097.

Meek, Ronald L., Raphael, David D., & Stein, Peter G. (1978). Adam Smith, lectures on Jurisprudence. Indianapolis Liberty Fund, United Kingdom.

Mendie, Patrick J., & Egbai, Mary J. (2015). An examination of the nexus between Thomas Hobbes: Concept of Human Nature and Theory of the State. African Journals Online, 15(2), 101–107. https://www.ajol.info/index.php/sophia/cart/view/136855/126350

Otteson, James. (2018). The Essential: Adam Smith. Fraser Institute, Canada, pp. 45–49. https://www.fraserinstitute.org/sites/default/files/essential-adam-smith.pdf

Ross, Simpson I. (2010). The Life of Adam Smith. OUP Oxford, United Kingdom, p. 02.

Rothbard, Murray N. (1995). Economic Thought Before Adam Smith: an Austrian Perspective on the History of Economic Thought. (vol. I). Ludwig von Mises Institute, USA.

Ryan, Alan. (2018). Escaping the War of All against All: Leviathan, Thomas Hobbes. Social Research: An International Quarterly, 85(3), 639–649. https://doi.org/10.1353/sor.2018.0036

Sabéran, Shirine. (2008). La notion d'intérêt général chez Adam Smith: de la richesse des nations à la puissance des nations. Géoéconomie, 45(2), 55–71. https://doi.org/10.3917/geoec.045.0055

Smith, Adam. (1776). An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. Edwin Cannan, United Kingdom.

Tabb, William K. (1999). Reconstructing Political Economy: The great divide in economic thought. Routledge, United Kingdom.

Vernon L, Smith. (1998). The Two Faces of Adam Smith. Southern Economic Journal, 65(1), 2–19. https://doi.org/10.2307/1061349

Wight, Jonathan B. (2007). The Treatment of Smith's Invisible Hand. The Journal of Economic Education, 38(3), 341–358. https://doi.org/10.3200/JECE.38.3.341-358

Wilson, Rodney. (2014). Economics and morality from an Islamic perspective. Edward Elgar Publishing, United Kingdom.

Winther, Rasmus G. (2016). The Structure of Scientific Theories. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Stanford University.

Published

2023-12-25

How to Cite

DJEGHRI, B. (2023). ADAM SMITH: EGOISM AT THE SERVICE OF THE ECONOMY. Bulletin of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv. Economics, 2 (223), 20-25. https://doi.org/10.17721/1728-2667.2023/223-2/3